Earlier this month, Dorie Clark threw down the gauntlet at Harvard Business Review by writing a post called Come Out of the Closet at Work, Whether You’re Gay or Not. I’ve decided to take on the challenge of blogging about the professionally relevant ways I am not the average science/environmental writer – and why these differences are assets, not disadvantages.
When I was in the Midwest, multiple people advised me to write for the alternative press. Once they found out what my background was, they jumped to the false conclusion that I must have politically radical views. My strategic choice to obscure my background in most of my workplaces came from my experiences with this assumption. I am writing this blog post because the article above persuaded me to change my mind.
But I know honesty fuels good prose. So I am going to write about these identities here and explain why I think outsider perspectives can enrich both journalism and blogging.
Unlike most environmentalists I’ve met, I grew up in a lower middle-class family in a major city, surrounded by people whose cultural backgrounds were different from mine. Our social circle was international, so I understand both Russian and Spanish. I also spent time in Russia.
Because of my experiences seeing food shortages in Russia and being on the less-wealthy side of the tracks in Chicago, writing about working-class communities is extraordinarily important to me. There are huge disconnects between these communities, including many communities of color, and the mainstream environmental movement. When I write about mainstream environmental issues, I do so from the perspective that low-income communities matter.
People don’t see my class and cultural background when they meet me. Because I am white, I can sometimes help bridge the gap between existing science and environmental organizations and the people they have not reached. However, this puts me in an awkward position. Because I can “pass” as a white, middle-class person, some people may not trust me. They don’t know that I had to learn the norms of middle-class workplaces by reading books about them.
My cultural experiences in Chicago didn’t just leave me with an interest in environmental justice; they also kindled an interest in the arts. I grew up writing spoken word, but it’s been years since I went to an open mic. During high school, I did an internship with the Mexican Fine Arts Center and made a mosaic of part of the Aztec calendar. I also made a mosaic of Pele, the Hawaiian volcano goddess, dancing on a slope. Today, I take dance classes four to five days a week.
This is why, when people talk about including the humanities in science writing, I perk up my ears. Dance, visual art, and other forms of creative expression can enrich science communication and bring the subject to life. I subscribe to the Facebook page of the Dance Your Ph.D. Contest, which is supported by Science Magazine and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Music has been a life-changing force for me. Contrary to stereotypes about metal fans, The Guardian has reported that students who are interested in metal are likely to be intelligent. I played guitar throughout high school and part of college, was in a band for a short time, and am finally donating that guitar to charity this month. I also listened to punk rock during and after college. One evening, I went from an honor society ceremony to a punk show.
My music taste has had a profound influence on my writing style. Even when I am not writing blog posts about zombie apocalypse messages in science communication, I find that a metal-and-sometimes-punk cultural sensibility works its way into most of the writing I produce – even nonprofit press releases. So far, no one has objected. Publicity writing tends to be more rosy than thorny, but using sharper prose doesn’t seem to damage my writing style; if anything, it improves the results.
These are the non-mainstream identities that have shaped or changed my science writing and professional interests – my relationships to class, culture, dance, visual art and music.




Pingback: My Science Story Is about Honesty | Science Is Everyone's Story
This is a very interesting tension, between being authentic to your whole self, and being concerned about the assumptions others might be making. I agree with you that incorporating various elements of your personality and/or experience makes for stronger writing, and frankly, my own diversity of interests is something I’ve always been proud of.
Not to say we shouldn’t take some care in crafting online identities for various audiences… but I’m generally in favor of making them as complex as we are in real life. More interesting world that way!
Sometimes, if personal brands are oversimplified, that can put people in boxes and reduce their creativity. I use my blog as a creative outlet, so a strategy like that wouldn’t work for me. Also, being authentic gives me motivation to blog, even if I am not getting a lot of comments right then. The more creative writing techniques I use, the more fun I have blogging. I wouldn’t want to use my blog just to promote my work or network. It has to be intrinsically fun.